Why should the law care about what I do behind closed doors?

Your speech is free. But if it causes malicious harm to someone, you can be sued.

You can stand on a public sidewalk and take pictures of my house. You can't walk into my house uninvited and start taking pictures.

Society sets laws announcing those actions that it deems unacceptable in polite society. If evidence appears that causes a reasonable person to suspect that illegal activity is going on, society should investigate. Of course society might find itself having to jump through hoops by adhering to constitutional law. It cannot just invade your personal space and demand to know what you're up to just because they don't like you.

What are some dirty secrets of Indian (Bollywood, etc.) actors and actresses?

The law shouldn't care (if you are a law abiding citizen) about who you take into the bedroom as long as they are consenting adults. How many guns you own. What you eat for supper. What kind of TV shows you watch. Whether you watch porn or not.

The law doesn't care about what you do behind closed doors as long as it is within the bounds of what the law allows.

It shouldn't to a point.

Do people of NYC drive around Central Park all the time? Is there any subway tunnel to cross the park quickly? Is it annoying for people and does it cause traffic?

If evidence arises that you are doing these things behind closed doors, don't you think the government has a moral obligation to investigate?

But what if you're raping little girls behind closed doors? Killing gay men? Watching child porn?

Liberty is not boundless. It does have its limits.

How did Nickelback gain a large fan base despite criticism of their music?